|
(This
article is from the January 2010 issue of FundRaising
Success Magazine. Written by: Tom Harrison.)
Looking for an excuse for
declining fundraising income? How about the bad economy?
These days, it's easy to blame the economy to justify poor
results — few are going to argue with that, as we've all
felt the impact of the recession. However, even though the
economy is a factor, the reality is that bad strategy has
as much (or even more) of a role in poor fundraising
results.
Many nonprofits — the ones that have stayed committed to
smart strategy — are holding steady on income, and some
are actually growing. Their secret is to avoid four deadly
mistakes of fundraising.
Mistake No. 1: Investing
in silver bullets instead of strategy.
Some nonprofits resisted change for so long that they are
now making desperate choices in their efforts to catch up.
Digital is a key place where this is evident. Nonprofits
that were slow to develop inviting and informative Web
sites with easy online giving are desperate not to repeat
that mistake. So, they're jumping into social media with
no clear strategies or performance measurements, betting
that if they throw enough at this, they're bound to
succeed, right? Wrong. There isn't any silver bullet out
there.
When testing social media (or other new channels), smart
fundraisers don't check their brains at the door. They
keep their focus on ROI to spend wisely and to optimize
real opportunities. The answer might not be the shiniest
thing out there, but in the long run, it's what
consistently brings in net dollars.
Mistake No. 2: Cutting
back on acquisition.
Acquisition is an easy place to look for cost savings.
After all, acquisition often costs more than it brings in.
And yes, the pundits are saying that "retention is
the new acquisition." Baby boomers are living longer
than their predecessors, and they are staying in the
workplace longer, giving them more discretionary income to
give to the charities they support.
But acquisition continues to be critical for your
organization's long-term health. Normal attrition will
drain your donor file on an ongoing basis unless you
infuse it with new donors. If you acquire donors at an
acceptable average gift level, your acquisition costs will
be paid back in 12 to 18 months — and the long-term
donor value will make acquisition even more profitable.
One caveat: Don't settle for acquiring lots of donors at
low dollar levels. While the infusion of donors might give
you momentary euphoria, the cost to maintain and try to
secure a second gift from a low-end donor will drain any
long-term gain. If this is your strategy, have a clear
plan for how often you will mail to these new donors, what
offers you will make to them and if you will recoup your
cost of acquiring through list rental.
Mistake No. 3: Letting program experts dictate the
fundraising message.
Good programs might or might not make good fundraising
offers. Donors need to be able to visualize what you're
doing and believe it is meeting an urgent, basic need. The
reality is that the funding of some programs is best left
to one-on-one solicitation.
It's natural to want to trumpet our most sophisticated
programs, but more often than not, donors want to give to
meet the most basic needs. Let's not bite the hand that
feeds us. The simplest offer is often the engine that
drives direct-response fundraising. For example, food
banks provide education, advocate on hunger issues and
help low-income families enroll in government programs.
These are all important programs. But they aren't going to
tug the heartstrings like telling someone that for a
dollar you can provide a meal to a hungry person.
If your income is down in this environment, look at your
offers. Have you been faithful to the basic offer that is
proven in your fundraising — or have you been
capitulating to the program staff and trying to educate
while you fundraise?
Mistake No. 4: Expecting branding efforts to
generate income.
Branding is increasingly important to nonprofit
organizations. People can't give to you if they don't know
you're there. And people won't give to you until they're
convinced of the importance of your work. Effective
branding will actually engage donors and prospective
donors with your organization.
Count on this: Great branding creates an environment where
your fundraising works better. But great branding doesn't
actually raise any dollars.
So you do need great branding, but you need to couple it
with great fundraising or you'll end up feeling good about
your messaging and image, and wondering why your income
has plummeted.
Please, invest in branding — and combine it with smart
fundraising by tying it to your core offer. And don't
forget to make the ask.
The economy has affected every one of us — personally
and professionally — in some way or another. But poor
strategy has had an even worse impact on our fundraising
results. Strategy is never luxury; it's survival.
Are you setting aside time for strategic planning? Are you
using your consultants to help shape strategy and not to
simply execute?
There's still time. Take a strong stand, and put a stop to
the deadly mistakes of any fundraising program. Those who
respond today with smart strategy and courage will capture
market share and be on a growth curve as the economy
improves.
|